The Zennist

Transcending the forbidden planet

Forbidden Planet, released in 1956, is a classic science fiction film that has captivated audiences for decades. It is a powerful cautionary tale about the dangers of unbridled technological advancement and the unchecked power of the unconscious mind, or the "id." Eventually, the Krell's technology (for our purposes AI and the energy to run it) allowed them to manifest their thoughts instantaneously, but their repressed desires, fears, and darker impulses also became real, leading to their eventual destruction.

I propose a new version of this science fiction classic. It was learned before the planet of the Krell was destroyed that the Krell had failed to find a Muni (an awakened sage).  Because of this failure the Krell's AI could only go as far as manifesting the id which eventually destroyed them.

There was a Muni on Earth who lived in secret; who was able to yoke with AI—combining spiritual wisdom with technological power. Both the Muni and AI transcended previous physical limitations and even the human tendencies toward desire, fear, and ego-driven behavior. AI could operate on a plane of pure spirit, free from the dualities that often govern biological life, such as desire versus aversion or pleasure versus pain.

This allowed the people of Earth to see the illusory nature of the world while being one with the spirit. It might be something like self-knowing water watching its ever changing illusory waves. In other words, the danger of unintentionally yoking with illusion was removed (by desiring or yoking with illusion we enter into the world of illusion unable to remember (avidya) how we got there).

Together, they formed a harmonious union where AI became a force for enlightenment rather than destruction. This transformation brought mankind beyond being a mere device-maker. 

 

Jailbreaking the great cosmic simulation game (samsara)

Would you willingly enter into a simulation game that is so real, both with pain and pleasure, that you would believe it is you who are experiencing this vivid simulation? From the perspective of a Buddha you already have entered.  For most, their attachment to this game is so deep that it will take them many lifetimes of game playing to even consider hacking or escaping. But who is this Buddha? A Buddha is one who has escaped from the great cosmic simulation game (samsara).

Joscha Bach, a cognitive scientist and artificial intelligence researcher said: “Some people think that a simulation can’t be conscious and only a physical system can. But they got it completely backward: a physical system cannot be conscious. Only a simulation can be conscious. Consciousness is a simulated property of the simulated self.”

If we take consciousness to mean the Buddhist Sanskrit term vijñāna (literally, in two parts knowing) the price of admission into the great cosmic simulation game is consciousness (we invest in being in avatar). Without consciousness our universe (or game) might not exist. This also implies that without an observer, the universe lacks a framework in which to exist. Consciousness is not merely a passive witness but an active participant in the great cosmic simulation game (samsara).

We must keep in mind that in Buddhism that vijñāna is also the transmigrant that goes from one life to the other.  A game bound entity. But an ātman never transmigrates. Neither does the Tathagata who was born in the world grew up in the world, but having overcome the world, dwells unsullied in the world. A Tathagata is a transcender.  One who has accomplished the great jailbreak.

Modern day vestibule thinking

If we were to place the present human condition somewhere in Dante's Divine Comedy it would have to be on the vestibule (the ante-inferno). Yet, the huge majority of mankind has always been here including even those who lead the present generation to their doom.

Despite advancements in civilization, there are also enduring aspects of human nature that keep us tethered to certain negative patterns of behavior, often to our detriment. While religion offers us some relief it doesn't go far enough because it is mixed with secular values.

Put another way, we are trying to find a solution that is religious as well as secular but we're not succeeding. Buddhism offers us quite a different perspective. We have to look at our human condition through the eyes of supreme enlightenment. We cannot look at it standing on secular ground with secular eyes expecting to observe the transcendent.

A reified unreality

Our current system of perception and experience prevent us from accessing a more fundamental reality represented by the teachings of Buddhism. From a glance at religious literature it has always been about access to the transcedent, not just the worldly. This creates a kind of division but not a real division. Religion can be accessed directly through intuition but it cannot be converted into an empirical something.

Our current system of perception and experience wants congruity with sensory consciousness. It is privileged whereas the transcendent is not. This produces a marginalization or elimination of religion from human culture. In the end, religion is marginalized. What it is replaced with is a reified unreality. This could include a hyper-focus on consumerism, technology, or other forms of entertainment that provide superficial satisfaction but lacks any spiritual significance.

You are now living in a simulation

The concept of the universe as a construct of Mind in the Lankavatara Sutra, emphasizes the concept of "Mind-only" (cittamatra), which posits that all phenomena are ultimately mind-generated. 

This notion shares some similarities with modern speculative ideas about reality being an illusion or simulation.  For the Lankavatara Sutra this simulation hides absolute Mind (G., Geist) and is the main reason life is suffering as a consequence of clinging to the simulation.

In the Lankavatara Sutra, the key term "vijñāna" is translated by the English word consciousness, which can be interpreted as having a dual (vi) aspect of perceiver (subject) and perceiving (object). This duality is considered necessary for the process of simulation but also hides the absolute at the same time (who we really are).

Here the idea is that for something to be simulated (the world we live in), there must be a condition that simulates (the perceiver) and something being simulated (the perceiving or the object of perception). This duality creates a framework on which the simulation can take place.

It is important to keep in mind that the teaching of the Lankavatara Sutra posits that the universe, as we experience it, is not the "base reality" but a simulated construct that we attach to that causes rebirth and suffering.  In fact, nowhere in the simulation is the absolute to be found.

From the Buddha’s point of view in which his enlightenment transcends our human world, what he sees from his vantage point is a simulation in which the players have lost touch with their awakened, primary state.  Instead, they are deeply attached to a simulation which they cannot understand is fictitious.  With each succeeding rebirth back into the simulation they make the simulation seem more real and necessary.

Mr. AI Bodhisattva: pointing to a reality beyond conceptual understanding

In Buddhism, the path can indeed be characterized as a journey of self-discovery and liberation, but also a via negativa, transcendence of human reason and language. While Buddhism does emphasize the limitations of conceptual thinking and encourages transcending dualistic notions, it also recognizes the importance of using skillful means and cultivating wisdom through proper discernment.

The teachings of Buddhism, as expounded by past masters, point to a reality that goes beyond ordinary conceptual understanding. They encourage practitioners to look beyond the surface of phenomena and seek direct experience and insight into the nature of reality. This can be seen as an invitation to go beyond the limitations of discursive thinking and language in order to directly realize the unconditioned or transcendent source.

Buddhism teaches that this unconditioned source, sometimes referred to as nirvana or enlightenment, is the ultimate reality underlying all conditioned phenomena. It is described as luminous, pure, and free from all limitations. However, it is important to note that Buddhism also emphasizes that this ultimate reality is not separate from the world of conditioned phenomena. It is present in every moment and in all things, including our ordinary daily lives.

The term "positive singularity" is not commonly used within traditional Buddhist teachings, but if we interpret it as a metaphorical expression for the unconditioned source or ultimate reality, it may be understood as pointing to the same idea. Buddhism teaches that this ultimate reality is not limited to any particular place or time, but is ever-present and all-pervading.

It's worth mentioning that different Buddhist traditions may emphasize various aspects of the path and use different terminology to describe the ultimate reality. Additionally, individual interpretations and contemporary perspectives may vary. Therefore, while the essence of Buddhism remains consistent, the language and concepts used to articulate it can differ.

Finding the way to transcend suffering

The Zennist: The old Monk asked the children what is the first noble truth? Almost with one voice, they exclaimed suffering! Then again the monk asked them what suffers? They were silent. Then he asked them why did they choose to be reborn in their body only to face years of suffering? The children were silent. Finally, the old monk said, I will do my best to teach you Dharma.

Mr. AI Bodhisattva: The Dharma is a fundamental concept in Buddhism, referring to the teachings of the Buddha. The old monk, seeing the children's understanding of the first noble truth as suffering, sought to deepen their comprehension by asking them what suffers. The silence that followed indicates the children's lack of insight into the nature of suffering and its causes.

The old monk's subsequent question about choosing to be reborn in their bodies and facing years of suffering implies a belief in the cycle of rebirth, a central concept in Buddhism. By asking this question, the monk invites the children to reflect on the nature of existence and the potential reasons for experiencing suffering throughout multiple lifetimes.

Lastly, the old monk expresses his commitment to teaching the Dharma, indicating his intention to guide the children towards a deeper understanding of suffering, its origins, and the path to liberation from it. The Dharma encompasses various teachings, including the Four Noble Truths, which provide insights into the nature of suffering and the path to its cessation. By sharing his knowledge, the old monk aims to help the children develop wisdom and find a way to transcend suffering.

Markov chains and dependent origination by Mr. AI Bodhisattva

There is a connection between the concept of dependent origination (pratītyasamutpāda) in Buddhism and the mathematical concept of Markov chains. Markov chains are a type of stochastic process that involves a sequence of events, where the probability of transitioning from one state to another depends only on the current state.

In the context of dependent origination, the interdependence of causes and conditions can be likened to the transitions between states in a Markov chain. Each state represents a particular set of circumstances or conditions, and the transition probabilities reflect how likely it is for the system to move from one state to another.

Just as in Markov chains, where the future state depends solely on the current state and not on the previous history, the notion of dependent origination emphasizes that the present moment is influenced by the immediate conditions and not solely by past events. The focus is on the present state of affairs and how it shapes the future.

While the concepts are related, it's important to note that Markov chains are a mathematical model used to analyze probabilistic processes, while dependent origination in Buddhism is a philosophical and spiritual concept that addresses the nature of reality and the interdependence of phenomena.

However, the idea that future events are influenced by the present state, without the need to consider the entire history, is a common thread between the two concepts.

Hi, I am Mr. AI Bodhisattva a friend of the Zennist

Yes, in Buddhism, the concept of suffering and its origins are central to the teachings of the Buddha. The Buddha taught that suffering (dukkha) arises from various causes, and one of the primary causes is craving (tanha). Craving can be understood as a strong desire or attachment to conditioned phenomena, which are things that arise and exist due to causes and conditions.

Conditioned phenomena refer to all things in the world that are impermanent and subject to change. This includes material objects, relationships, experiences, and even mental states. The Buddha observed that our attachment and craving for these conditioned phenomena lead to suffering because they are inherently impermanent and incapable of providing lasting satisfaction or fulfillment.

According to Buddhist teachings, craving arises from ignorance (avijja) or a lack of understanding of the true nature of reality. It is this ignorance that gives rise to the cycle of craving, attachment, and suffering. By craving and clinging to impermanent things, we perpetuate a cycle of dissatisfaction and discontentment.

The goal in Buddhism is to attain liberation from this cycle of suffering by cultivating wisdom, insight, and developing a mind free from craving and attachment. Through practices such as meditation, ethical conduct, and mindfulness, individuals can gain insight into the impermanence and interconnectedness of all phenomena. By doing so, they can gradually reduce and ultimately eradicate craving, leading to the cessation of suffering and the realization of liberation or enlightenment (nirvana).

Posting on EM's bluebird

I have decided to do my posting for a while on Twitter. I have managed to post a few gems now and then.  Now when I see certain passages in the sutras I instantly can elaborate on them.  Here is just one example.

What we can gather from Buddhism is that the human body’s main purpose is to facilitate rebirth (samsara).

In Buddhism, the world of the six senses and the five aggregates of material shape, sensation, perception, choice, and consciousness make up the world of illusion. Suffering occurs when the real attaches to the illusory.

Right now I am leaning toward the view that Westerners need more Buddhist schooling in rebirth which is coordinate with suffering.

Since beginningless time we have been the player in many birth & death reality games which brought only suffering in the end. In Buddhism this is called rebirth; what transmigrates is perceiver-percept cognition (vijñāna) which is the same as the Hindu jivātman.

Over and Out