As a thought exercise think of water translucently clear that has the potential to recognize itself but so far cannot see anything distinctive of itself. There is nothing there or so it would seem. However, in a state of agitation it sees something. But these wave forms it sees are different from itself. In fact they act to hide the water’s translucently clear presence. This is implying that wherein there is no distinction there can be no kind of knowledge.
But this further implies that there has to be a separation between the knower and the known; that if there is no such division there can be no knowledge. But in Buddhism absolute knowledge is different. Such knowledge consists in getting rid of the illusion of separation. But how does one do this?
Sub specie aeternitatis, there is not the slightest difference between the conditioned and the unconditioned. But if we cling to the conditioned which is illusory, failing to realize the unconditioned nature, we are lost. Making matters worse, our intellect bound up with the imagination will always lead us astray such that we can only imagine the unconditioned believing we have realized it. But the truth is we have failed to liberate our self even with metaphysics not to mention all of its captivating thought forms.
The core of Buddhism is about awakening to the fundamental essence of thought, thought being the smallest building block of the conditioned. No amount of thinking or speculation will liberate us. The Buddha’s awakening went beyond this. We are not there yet. Yes, we have the potential to become enlightened but we must still actualize that potential.
Comments