« Trying to remember our Buddha-nature | Main | What Zen boils down to »

September 02, 2019


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Well, no. The tetralemma is a common feature of Indian logic. It was also used by Democritus and the Pyrrhonist skeptics, and was put to good use by some of the most sophisticated Buddhist logicians such as Nagarjuna. It takes a certain degree of mental refinement to understand why the four-fold negation system is useful. For this reason it is best for you to practice good moral conduct and perhaps some chanting, but to study Zen you just don’t have what it takes.

Koans don't work. If they did, Zen wouldn't be such a mess. Koans merely contribute to the degeneration of language skills and logic that can lead one to write nonsense like "and eliminates the various paths/ approaches, that is to say, Self, non-Self, not-Self and not non-Self" which is absolutely incoherent. (With very rare excwptions, e.g. "does a dog have Buddha nature?" 99.9% of koans are just stoner logic.)

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo