« Conceptually constructed copies of our true nature | Main | Using profit in a moral way »

June 22, 2016


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

David Brainerd: Yes they are hopeless and dangerous. Even the Pali Nikayas don't agree with their opinions. In fact, it is the very attā/ātman (pacc-atta/praty-ātman) that attains nirvana (M.i.255-256). The Zennist has long believed that most Western Buddhists think Buddhism is a species of Indian materialism when it is quite the opposite.

I had some guy on youtube tell me that I need to read Bodhidharma because I was saying Buddha did teach the existence of a self, and supposedly Bodhidharma would set me straight. So after reading that comment I went to Barnes and Nobles after work, and they actually had a translation of Bodhidharma there (never seen it before), so I started reading it, and what does he say? If you know your true 'self-nature' then you're a Buddha. But supposedly there's no self, right? LOL! Its obvious the no-self dummies will twist any statement into there being no self. They refuse to understand Buddha, they refuse to understand Bodhidharma. They're hopeless.

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo