It is fundamental to Zen that the person who is committed to its process give up the strong belief that Suchness or tathata (i.e., spiritual substance) is perceivable as something determinate for sensory consciousness. It is not. The direct penetration into Suchness is a mystery; moreover, it shall ever remain a mystery even while we stand in its presence, awakened.
To reiterate, Suchness attained will always remain incapable of being adequately described or perceived by our senses, including consciousness. Put a different way, when we step off of our psychophysical scaffolding onto Suchness, Suchness will still be a complete mystery except that we are now this mystery. What we will see as a result of this stepping off is the psychophysical qua the psychophysical because we are no longer psychophysical scaffolding anymore. In the words of Zen master Goso:
“The sweet melon is sweet even through the stem;
The bitter gourd is bitter even to the roots.”
The world, including this psychophysical body of ours, is a much different world from the standpoint of the mystery of attained Suchness. A huge thing like a galaxy is now the huge body of mysterious Suchness—a photon is now a small body of mysterious Suchness.
With satori, the so-called abyss that we once feared, we have become. Looking now from the vantage point of the abyss or Suchness, we really come to see what ‘clinging’ means and what drives it. This reminds me of the fifth koan, Kyogen Mounts the Tree, in Paul Reps’ book, Zen Flesh, Zen Bones.
"KYOGEN SAID: “Zen is like a man hanging in a tree by his teeth over a precipice. His hands grasp no branch, his feet rest on no limb, and under the tree another person asks him: ‘Why did Bodhidharma come to China from India?'
If the man in the tree does not answer, he fails; and if he does answer, he falls and loses his life. Now what shall he do?”
Of course the obvious answer is simply to let go. But now we come back to the beginning of this blog about the process of Zen. The average person, as they look into the terrifying abyss of Suchness, demand to know what this Suchness is before they commit themselves to letting go. But this can’t be done. For those who have let go; who have converged with the mysterious, undying ground of Suchness—being Suchness, itself—they can only laugh at such stupid demands as they pull out a saw, or grease the scaffolding so the adept will slip off of it and fall into the mysterious abyss of Suchness.
“If the man in the tree does not answer, he fails; and if he does answer, he falls and loses his life. Now what shall he do?”
As you say: “The average person, as they look into the terrifying abyss of Suchness, demand to know what this Suchness is before they commit themselves to letting go.” might respond:
Why not grab onto a limb with his arms/hands, answer the question (or respond that he doesn’t know), then hang on with his teeth again (if he want to)? Otherwise, if he completely lets go to answer the question, he better be a fast talker as he falls.
In other words, most people would rather remain in their comfort zones of illusion, rather than take risks to venture into the abyss, or ascribe to the notion that “he who loses his life shall find it.”
Posted by: Paul B from Cali | May 06, 2011 at 01:34 PM