According to Dr. Hajime Nakamura, learning to speak Chinese was extremely difficult for the Japanese; even for official students sent to China during the Heian period (9th–12th century) who were supposed to learn to speak Chinese. How, for example, a Japanese Buddhist like Dôgen communicated with a Chinese monk was by writing out Chinese characters.
Needless to say, for one reason or another, the Japanese more than often misrepresented original Chinese texts. More importantly, Buddhism as introduced from China underwent many changes when, according to Dr. Nakamura, it entered Japan.
To understand just how Buddhism was transformed when it entered Japan requires that we understand, so to speak, the Japanese soul which, in a word, holds that the phenomenal world is the absolute which in a word is phenomenalism. On this subject, in his book, Ways of Thinking of Eastern Peoples, Dr. Nakamura writes:
“In the first place, we should notice that the Japanese are willing to accept the phenomenal world as Absolute because of their disposition to lay a greater emphasis upon intuitive sensible concrete events, rather than upon universals. This way of thinking with emphasis upon the fluid, arresting character of observed events regards the phenomenal world itself as Absolute and rejects the recognition of anything existing over and above the phenomenal world” (p. 350).
As a result of this kind of cultural view of reality, Japanese Buddhism, especially Zen, is not untouched by the phenomenalist view. Dr. Nakamura continues:
"The way of thinking that seeks for the Absolute in the phenomenal world plays an effective role in the assimilation of the Zen sect as well. The Zen Buddhism in Dôgen seems to have been influenced by the Japanese Tendai Buddhism. This fact has often been alluded to by specialists but has not been fully explored. Here I shall point out a few examples which reveal the phenomenalist way of thinking. The Chinese translated “dharmatâ” in Sanskrit as “the real aspect of all things.” This concept refers to the real aspect of all kinds of phenomena in our experience, and therefore is compose of two distinct contradictory elements, “all things” and “the real aspect.” But Tendai Buddhism gave this phrase the interpretation which emphasized the “the real aspect is all things.” Dôgen meant to say that the truth which people search for [in] reality, [is] nothing but the world of our daily experience. Thus he says, ‘The real aspect is all things. All things are this aspect, this character, this body, this mind, this world, this wind and this rain, this sequence of daily going, living, sitting, and lying down, this series of melancholy, joy, action, and inaction, this stick and wand, this Buddha’s smile, this transmission and reception of the doctrine, this study and practice, this evergreen pine and ever unbreakable bamboo’" (pp. 351–352).
It is not difficult to see where this is leading. Dr. Nakamura observes that “For Dôgen...the fluid aspect of impermanence is in itself the absolute state.” And thus we find Dôgen saying in the Shôbôgenzô, in the section on “Life and Death” that “impermanence is Buddhhood”!
For Dôgen and many other Japanese thinkers, but by no means all, the phenomenal world is the absolute. It is not illusory. Neither is there a beyond nor a higher mind. What you see is basically the Buddha-nature. According to Dôgen in the Shôbôgenzô, in the section on “Buddha Nature”: “Since this is the way things are, to look at mountains and rivers is to look at Buddha Nature, and to see Buddha Nature is to see the jaw of a donkey and the muzzle of a horse.” This, of course, cuts against Indian Buddhism where phenomena are considered to be illusory and empty such as the “jaw of a donkey.”
Naturally, those who worship Dôgen’s brand of Zen will defend his phenomenalism. I expect this. However, it would be advisable to first read the the Mahaparinirvana Sutra which treats the subject of Buddha-nature and see how Dôgen’s words tally with the Sutra, itself.
When I read this blog entry, I don't really understand how some readers have been able to spot hidden references to President Obama’s political agenda, Marxist-Leninism, or some form of anti-Japanese nationalism.
From what I can tell, the author only quoted a Japanese philosopher who said that the Japanese mind [probably due to their Shintoist religious background] does not usually apprehend the absolute apart from the phenomenal world. This leads the author to say that this might be the reason why Eihei Dogen seems to give an absolute status to phenomena. In other words, this means that Dogen tends to consider that the image reflected in the mirror is itself the mirror and its luminous reflective nature.
Now we might disagree with the author’s interpretation of Dogen, but I do not think that ad hominem attacks make a good argument to prove him wrong.
-Huanshen
Posted by: Huanshen | November 02, 2009 at 03:44 AM
The demon ZMAN (....) comments)---then read a communist manifest by K Marx or Engels and tell me it doesnt reflect a contemporary world as we experience it today.
It certainly takes SCUM to praise SCUM. Next youll be praising the mass murderer Mao , like Obamazo's socialist ... love to do.
You lost all your 'friends' quickly for one reason, demon, you let your true colors shine thru.
Heres a clue you short little aging old yankee piece of ...,---Socialism has NEVER worked, ever. Never fucking ever, old ....
Deluded scum, thy name is ..., a midget version of ted turner, and almost as (un) intelligent.
Posted by: emelia | November 01, 2009 at 02:30 PM
There is no need to insult the author if you disagree with his arguments. Just present your own as a viable alternative.
It would be unwise to hold any political view other the a socialist one if you are an active buddhist.
If you dont understand this then read a communist manifest by K Marx or Engels and tell me it doesnt reflect a contemporary world as we experience it today.
What man does with the words of these geniouses, is very much alike what man does with the words of Buddha eg. they drag them in mud and pretend to like the new taste better.
I personally consider this blog one of outmost necessity in terms of guidance for those in need of basic Buddhism, yet to each one it should stand clear that no man is without fault in the face of changing conditions.
Posted by: zman | November 01, 2009 at 04:48 AM
The Zennist author is a self-confessed socialist dirtbag. An anti-capitalist crypto-commie.
I wonder if the dirtbag is still proud of his vote for that demon Obamozo.
I forget, he is also a self-confessed draft-dodger.
Posted by: emelia | October 31, 2009 at 03:44 PM
"Reading this article I get this gut feeling that the author, probably american, has never visited Japan, much less devoted any first hand study of the country, and so gained little insight into the very refined Japanese mind. But this doesnt surprise me."
Ah, the land of Japan where foreign guest workers are 'looked down' and Korean and other Asian are treated as 'inferior race'.
The majority Japanese however often kiss the 'white' (not black, they dislike African-American) American buttocks when they see them. The Japanese people's personality also seem to exhibit a sort of complex not unlike Napoleon Complex when they are in close proximity with the white American.
Now hacking back to Zen, there are some 'secret' Buddhist sects in Okinawa who have admitted that their method of practice is very similar to Darkzen (which is the Buddha Zen). They also confessed the real modern Zen practice in Japan is used only for funeral service.
One can sit straight, look pious and mumbling some words from the Sutra to impress the folk. It is easy to do when you know there is a pot of money left behind by the temple visitors, waiting to be stacked away.
Those charlatan Japanese Zen priests! LOL
Bodhiratna
Posted by: Bodhiratna | October 30, 2009 at 12:08 PM