« A generation going in the wrong direction | Main | An immaterial body? »

March 08, 2017


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Aryeh: In Yāska's etymological work, Nirukta, which predates Buddhism, we learn what ātman means. First of all, it is not a self (a pronoun) or an individual. It refers to what animates us—an animative principle in other words.

Westerners use the word awareness a lot. Is it a translation of citta, vijñāna, jñāna, smṛti, etc.? I have no idea. I wish translators would not use it or at least show in parenthesis the Pali or Sanskrit term the translation is using.

how does consciousness differ from atman? what is an Atman? is it pure awareness without any thoughts, emotions, impressions or something completely different?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

My Photo